Showing posts with label The Self. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Self. Show all posts

Saturday, July 6, 2019

Saccidānanda | Existence-Consciousness-Bliss

Saccidananda

Saccidānanda (IAST)
Translation: "existence-consciousness-bliss"

A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy
Sanskrit: सच्चिदानन्द
Transliteration: Saccidānanda
Translation: "existence / knowledge / bliss; Existence Absolute, Consciousness Absolute, Bliss Absolute"
Definition:
  1. According to theistic Vedānta schools and Śaivite schools, they are the attributes of God (Brahman).
  2. According to Advaita Vedānta, it is the very essence of the Absolute (Brahman).

The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy
sat/chit/ananda, also Saccidānanda, three Sanskrit terms combined to refer to the Highest Reality as ‘existence, intelligence, bliss’. The later thinkers of Advaita Vedānta, such as Shankara, used the term to denote the Absolute, Brahman, a state of oneness of being, of pure consciousness and of absolute value or freedom. These are not to be taken as attributes or accidents that qualify Brahman but terms that express its essential nature as experienced by human beings. Sat (being, existence) is also Satyam (truth), affirming that Brahman is experienced as being itself, not a being over against another. Cit is pure consciousness, consciousness without object, and Ānanda is the experience of unlimited freedom and universal potentiality as well as satisfaction and the bliss that transcends both all that is pleasurable in the world and release from the bondage of Saṃsāra. Hindu theists understand sat/chit/ananda as the qualities of the supreme god.


References:
  1. Grimes, John (1996). A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy: Sanskrit Terms Defined in English. Albany: State University of New York Press
  2. Audi, Robert (1999). The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Second Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press

Friday, July 5, 2019

Puruṣa | The Spirit

Purusha

Puruṣa (IAST)
Translation: "the Spirit"

A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy
Sanskrit: पुरुष
Transliteration: Puruṣa
Translation: "spirit; individual soul; “person”; the indwelling form of God; cosmic person"
Definition:
  1. One of the two basic categories of the Sāṅkhya system. It is pure consciousness, unattached and unrelated to anything. It is non-active, unchanging, eternal, and pure. There are an infinite number of individual souls.
  2. According to Kashmir Shaivism, it is enveloped in the five sheaths of time, restriction, desire, knowledge, and portion of time (Kāla, Niyati, Rāga, Vidyā, and Kalā). It is the universal Self appearing under limitation as the many individual souls.
  3. According to Advaita Vedānta, it is fundamentally one. It is the eternal witness, the modification-less, the one who knows the body. Really speaking, the supreme Self (Paramātman) is the one and the only Puruṣa.
  4. The Puruṣa-Sūkta describes the primal Puruṣa as thousand-headed, thousand-eyed, thousand-footed, immanent and transcendent, covering the earth on all sides and extending beyond the length of ten fingers, all that is, has been, and will be. One-fourth of him is all beings, three-fourths of him are what is immortal in heaven.
  5. Depending on the context, the word may refer to either the “individual soul” or “God, Supreme.”

Glossary to the Record of Yoga (Sri Aurobindo)
Puruṣa — man; person; soul; spirit; the Self (Ātman) “as originator, witness, support and lord and enjoyer of the forms and works of Nature” (Prakṛti); the conscious being, universal or individual, observing and upholding the activity of Nature on any plane of existence; the infinite divine Person (Puruṣottama), “the Existent who transcends all definition by personality and yet is always that which is the essence of personality;” any of the ten types of consciousness (Daśa-Gāvas) in the evolutionary scale.

The Science of Yoga (I.K. Taimni)
Commentary: "The Puruṣa is not only the ultimate source of all perception as pointed out in Part 4, Sūtra 18, but he is also the motive power or reason of this play of Vāsanā which keep the mind in incessant activity. It is for him that all this long evolutionary process is taking place although he is always hidden in the background. It follows from this that even in the exalted conditions of consciousness which the Yogi might reach in the higher stages of Yoga, he is dependent upon something distinct and separate, though within him. He cannot be truly Self-sufficient and Self-illuminated until he is fully Self-realized and has become one with the Reality within himself. It is the realization of this fact, of his falling short of his ultimate objective, which weans the Yogi from the exalted illumination and bliss of the highest plane and makes him dive still deeper within himself for the Reality which is the consciousness of the Puruṣa." p. 334

"The Puruṣa by his very nature is eternal, omniscient and free and his involution in matter which involves tremendous limitations is brought about by his being made to lose the awareness of his Real nature. The power which deprives him of this knowledge or rather awareness of his Real nature is called Māyā or Illusion in Hindu philosophy and the result of this privation of knowledge is called Avidyā or ignorance. It is obvious that the words illusion and ignorance are used in their highest philosophical sense and we can barely get a glimpse into the real significance of these words. To understand Māyā and Avidyā in the real sense is to solve the Great Mystery of Life and to be free from their domination. This is the end and not the starting point of the search." p. 178

"If the union of Puruṣa and Prakṛti has been brought about by Māyā or Avidyā and leads through the development of the Kleśa to the misery and sufferings of embodied existence, it follows logically that the removal of these latter is possible only when the union is dissolved by the destruction of Avidyā. The union is the sole cause of bondage. Its dissolution must therefore be the only means available for Emancipation or Kaivalya of the Seer. The bondage is maintained by the Puruṣa identifying himself with his vehicles right from the Atmic to the physical plane. The release is brought about by his disentangling himself in consciousness from his vehicles one after another until he stands free from them, even though using them merely as instruments." p. 180

"When the pure consciousness of the Puruṣa is associated with Prakṛti, it becomes increasingly conditioned as it descends, plane by plane, these different degrees of conditioning being represented by the four stages of the Guṇa (Part 2, Sūtra 19). It should, however, be borne in mind that Sāṅkhya is based upon the absolute transcendence of the Puruṣa. According to it, the Puruṣa does not descend into Prakṛti but is merely associated with Prakṛti in an undefined manner. The mere propinquity of Puruṣa brings about changes in Prakṛti, one of these changes being the development of conditioned consciousness. It is because the Puruṣa is always quite separate and distinct from Prakṛti that all phenomena of consciousness or awareness are considered purely Prakṛtic, based on Sattva Guṇa. For all practical purposes, the word Sattva as used in the present context may be taken as the principle of awareness expressing through the faculty of Buddhi. The Puruṣa remains quite separate from it though his presence stimulates the awareness through Buddhi. This awareness becomes more and more vivid and simulates more perfectly the consciousness of the Puruṣa as it is expressed through the increasingly subtler stages of the Guṇa, but there can be nothing common between the two, for the former is a pure product of Prakṛti while the latter transcends Prakṛti altogether. The two are quite distinct. This is what is meant by the phrase Atyantāsaṅkīrnayoḥ." p. 299-300

"As the pure consciousness of the Puruṣa is really quite separate and yet appears indistinguishable from awareness in the realm of Prakṛti, the question arises how to separate the two in order to gain knowledge of the Puruṣa. The method prescribed in Part 3, Sūtra 36 is Saṃyama on the distinction between the purpose hidden behind the Pratyaya and the purpose of the Puruṣa himself. The Pratyaya is for another. It is a product of Prakṛti which according to Sāṅkhya acts only and always for the Puruṣa. The consciousness of the Puruṣa is for the Puruṣa himself. It has no ulterior motive or purpose, the Puruṣa being eternal, changeless and Self-sufficient. This distinction, subtle though it is, can be made the object of Saṃyama and it is possible in this manner to resolve the apparently homogeneous Pratyaya into its two components, the Sattva Guṇa in which the consciousness of the Puruṣa is reflected and the consciousness of the Puruṣa himself. The problem is not unlike that of distinguishing between a source of light and its reflection in a mirror. Just as there can be several methods of distinguishing between the real object and its reflection, so there can be several methods of distinguishing between the reflection of the Puruṣa in Sattva and the Puruṣa himself. The method proposed is one of them and leads to the knowledge of the Puruṣa himself as distinguished from his reflection in Sattva. When this knowledge is obtained, the Yogi is in a position to exercise non-instrumental perception hinted at in Part 3, Sūtra 34. As the Puruṣa is above the limitations of Prakṛti, his perception must also be above the limitations of the mind and the sense-organs." p. 301

"The illusion is destroyed completely and in the real sense only when the Yogi is able to leave the vehicle at will in Samādhi and to look down upon it, as it were, from a higher plane. Then he realizes definitely that he is different from that particular vehicle and can never, after such an experience, identify himself with that vehicle as has been explained in dealing with Part 2, Sūtra 6. The process of separating off the vehicle and disentangling consciousness from it is repeated over and over again on the superphysical planes until the last vehicle—the Atmic—is transcended in Nirbīja Samādhi and the Puruṣa stands free (Svarupe‘vasthanam) ‘in his own-form’." p. 180

"How do we know that it is the Puruṣa whom we are seeking in all these multifarious objectives? Because while the objectives keep changing all the time and never satisfy us, he always remains in the background. He is the common factor in all our efforts to find happiness through ever-changing forms and, therefore, he must be the real object of our search. Simple reasoning, is it not? He is thus not only the constant background of consciousness (Part 4, Sūtra 18) which illuminates the mind in all its activities, but also the hidden drawing force of desire in all its forms and phases."

One important consequence of the Puruṣa being the ultimate goal amidst all the changing objectives which we pursue is that no condition of existence attained by the Yogi, however exalted it may be, can give him abiding peace. The Divine urge within him will, sooner or later, assert itself and make him dissatisfied with the condition he has attained, until he has found the Puruṣa in Self-realization. For the consciousness of the Puruṣa alone is Self-sufficient, Self-contained and Self-illuminated and until this is attained there can be no real security, no real freedom and no abiding peace." p. 373-374

The Upanishads: Volume I (Swami Nikhilananda)
"A hymn of the Rig-Veda addressed to the Puruṣa (the Cosmic Person) describes His universal form in the following manner: The Puruṣa has a thousand heads, a thousand eyes, and a thousand feet. He covers the universe on all sides and transcends it "by the measure of ten fingers." All this—the past, the present, and the future—is indeed the Puruṣa; He alone is the Lord of all, mortal and immortal. "Its hands and feet are everywhere; Its eyes and head are everywhere; Its ears are everywhere; It stands encompassing all in the world." "The heavens are His head; the sun and moon, His eyes; the quarters, His ears, the revealed Vedas, His speech; the wind is His breath; the universe, His heart. From his feet is produced the earth. He is, indeed, the Inner Self of all beings." This universal form comprises not only our earth and the galactic system to which it belongs, but all the fourteen worlds of Hindu mythology—the seven above and the seven below—and all the animate and inanimate creatures dwelling therein, including gods and angels, men and animals, birds and insects, trees, plants, shrubs, and creepers. This totality is the Lord's universal form."


References:
  1. Grimes, John (1996). A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy: Sanskrit Terms Defined in English. Albany: State University of New York Press
  2. Hartz, Richard. Glossary to the Record of Yoga (Sri Aurobindo). Retrieved from http://wiki.auroville.org.in/wiki/Glossary_to_the_Record_of_Yoga
  3. Taimni, I. K. (1975). The Science of Yoga: The Yoga-Sūtras of Patañjali in Sanskrit with Transliteration in Roman, Translation in English and Commentary: Theosophical Publishing House
  4. Nikhilananda, Swami (1949). The Upanishads: Volume I—Katha, Iśa, Kena, and Mundaka. New York, New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers. p. 69-71.

Paramātman | The Supreme Self

Paramatman

Paramātman (IAST)
Translation: "the supreme Self"

A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy
Sanskrit: परमात्मन्
Transliteration: Paramātman
Translation: "the supreme Self; Brahman; God; the Absolute (from parama = "highest" + ātma = "Self")"
Definition: "According to Sāṅkhya, the conscious individual (Puruṣa) is called Paramātman."

The Upanishads: Volume I (Swami Nikhilananda)
"The Vedānta philosophy admits the existence of a multitude of individual souls, Jivātmās, and distinguishes these from the Supreme Soul, Paramātmā. The individual soul is attached to a body and is the victim of hunger and thirst, pain and pleasure, good and evil, and the other pairs of opposites. Limited in power and wisdom, it is entangled in the eternal round of Samsāra and seeks deliverance from it. Scriptural study, instruction from a teacher, and practice of ethical and spiritual disciplines are all meant for the benefit of bound, individual souls. The Supreme Soul, or Brahman, is omnipresent, omnipotent, omniscient. It is eternally free, illumined, and pure.

When a man realizes Brahman, he transcends the scriptures, ethics, and the injunctions of religion; but until that moment the experiences of the embodied individual soul are real to him. As long as he sees good and evil, he must cultivate the former and shun the latter. The experience of deep sleep is real to the sleeper, but it ceases to exist when he begins to dream. Dream experiences are real to the dreamer, but become meaningless when he is awake. Likewise, waking experiences are real to the waking person, but become meaningless to him when he attains the Knowledge of Brahman.

Though the individual soul and the Supreme Soul are apparently as different from each other as "a glow-worm from the sun and a mustard seed from Mt. Everest," yet in reality they are completely identical. Each individual soul is Brahman, the Absolute. Its real nature appears to be limited by the Upādhis of the sense-organs, the mind, the Prāna, and so forth, all created by ignorance, or Avidyā. Under the influence of this cosmic illusion, which is capable of making the impossible possible, the attributeless Brahman becomes both Maheśvara, or the Supreme Lord, and the Jīva, or individual soul. The former has Māyā under his control; the latter is controlled by Māyā. The individual soul takes Māyā to be real. The Upanishads admit the empirical reality (Vyavahārika Sattvā) of the Jīva and deal with its characteristics, wanderings, and final deliverance. But it must always be remembered that the self is Ātman, one and without a second. "This is your self that is within all."

Ātman, through Māyā, has projected material forms from Itself and then entered into them as their living self—anena jivena ātmanā anupraviśya. Thus, the Upanishads speak of two souls, as it were, dwelling side by side in man: the Real Soul and the apparent soul. "Two there are who dwell within the body, in the Buddhi, the supreme Ākāśa of the heart, enjoying the sure rewards of their own actions. The knowers of Brahman describe them as light and shade..." When it is said that the Supreme Soul enjoys rewards, the statement is to be taken in a figurative sense. He does not, in reality, enjoy anything, but looks on indifferently at the activities of the other soul. The contrast between the two is made vivid in the following text: "Two birds, inseparable friends, cling to the same tree. One of them eats the sweet fruit; the other looks on without eating. On the same tree the Puruṣa sits, grieving, immersed, bewildered by his own impotence. But when he sees the other, the Lord, contented, and knows His glory, then his grief passes away." The whole fifth chapter of the Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad is devoted to the contrast between the Supreme Soul and the individual soul. The individual soul is endowed with desire, ego, and mind; it enjoys the fruits of its actions; it is limited and insignificant. But it wins Immortality after ridding itself of its Upādhis. Then it is recognized as identical with the infinitely great Supreme Soul. "It is not woman, it is not man, nor is it neuter. Whatever body it takes, with that it is joined. By means of thoughts, touching, seeing, and passions, the Jīva assumes successively, in various places, various forms in accordance with his deeds, just as the body grows when food and drink are poured into it. The Jīva assumes many shapes, coarse or refined, in accordance with his virtue, and having himsef caused his union with them, is seen as different beings, through the qualities of his acts and the qualities of his body.

It has already been stated that the Supreme Soul, through Māyā, assumes a limited body and becomes finite and individualized. The great mystery is that even while subjected to all the limitations and sufferings of the relative world, It does not in reality lose, even in the slightest degree, Its perfect nature. While the Jīva, compelled by the bright and dark fruits of its actions, enters on a good or bad birth, follows a course upwards or downwards, and roams about overcome by the pairs of opposites, "his immortal Self remains like a drop of water on a lotus leaf. He himself is overcome by the Guṇas of nature. Then, because he is thus overcome, he becomes bewildered, and because he is bewildered, he does not see the Creator, the holy Lord, abiding within himself. Carried along by the waves of the Guṇas, darkened in his imagination, unstable, fickle, crippled, full of desires, vacillating, sensual, disordered, and a prey to delusion, he fancies: 'This is I,' 'This is mine,' and fetters himself by his own action, as a bird by its nest.""


References:
  1. Grimes, John (1996). A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy: Sanskrit Terms Defined in English. Albany: StateUniversity of New York Press
  2. Nikhilananda, Swami (1949). The Upanishads: Volume I—Katha, Iśa, Kena, and Mundaka. New York, New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers. p. 87-89.

Thursday, June 27, 2019

Hṛdaya | Heart

Hridaya

Hṛdaya (IAST)
Translation: "heart"

A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy
Sanskrit: हृदय
Transliteration: Hṛdaya
Translation: "heart; center or core of something; essence; the Self"
Definition:
  1. The psycho-physical center where an individual feels pleasure and pain.
  2. The space where the in-breath and out-breath merge. The true heart. The place where the breath is still in the state of merging.

The Upanishads: Volume I (Swami Nikhilananda)
"The heart has received much attention from the seers of the Upanishads. It is the resting-place of the Prāṇa, the senses, and the mind. It is the abode of Brahman. "That great birthless Self, which is identified with the intellect and is in the midst of the organs, lies in the Ākāśa that is within the heart. It is the controller of all, the lord of all, the ruler of all." Its physical shape is often compared to a lotus bud. The aspirant is asked to meditate on Brahman dwelling in the heart."


References:
  1. Grimes, John (1996). A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy: Sanskrit Terms Defined in English. Albany: State University of New York Press
  2. Nikhilananda, Swami (1949). The Upanishads: Volume I—Katha, Iśa, Kena, and Mundaka. New York, New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers. p. 92.

Saturday, June 8, 2019

Sākṣi-Caitanya | The Witness Consciousness

Sakshi-Chaitanya

Sākṣi-Caitanya (IAST)
Translation: "the witness consciousness"

A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy
Sanskrit: साक्षिचैतन्य
Transliteration: Sākṣi-Caitanya
Translation: "the witness consciousness"
Definition: "According to Advaita Vedānta, it is the awareness which underlies and supports all the states of consciousness. It pervades the waking, dreaming, and deep-sleep states. It is not a state like one of these three, but being omnipresent, it is the common denominator that runs throughout them.

Reference:
  1. Grimes, John (1996). A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy: Sanskrit Terms Defined in English. Albany: State University of New York Press

Thursday, June 6, 2019

Jīvanmukta | Liberated While Living

Jivanmukta

Jīvanmukta (IAST)
Translation: "Liberated While Living"

A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy
Sanskrit: जीवन्मुक्त
Transliteration: Jīvanmukta
Translation: "liberated while living"
Definition:
  1. A doctrine admitted by Sāṅkhya, Advaita Vedānta, Kashmir Śaivism, and Śaiva Siddhānta, though with variations according to each system. The doctrine posits that an individual may be liberated even while living in a physical body.
  2. According to Sāṅkhya, it occurs the moment there is an essential, experiential discrimination between the individual soul (Puruṣa) and primordial Nature (Prakṛti). The physical body continues due to past actions (Karma), which had brought it about in the first place. When this action (Karma) subsides, through experience thereof, the physical body falls and one is then released without the body (Videha-Mukti).
  3. According to Advaita Vedānta, liberation occurs with the destruction of ignorance (Avidyā). The continuance of the physical body is in no way incompatible to liberation. Before liberation, one realizes that the physical body is only an illusory appearance. If the body were real, liberation could occur only after its destruction. However, liberation is a change of perspective. Since the physical body is not real, its continued appearance or disappearance is of no consequence. Thus, the Jīvanmukta is one who lives in the world, but is not of it. Whether such an individual has a body or not is of no difference.
  4. According to Śaiva Siddhanta, it is an individual soul which is freed from Āṇava-, Māyā-, and Karma-Malas and their operations. The individual enjoys bliss even while living in an embodied state.

The Upanishads: Volume I (Swami Nikhilananda)
"How does a Jīvanmukta, a liberated soul, act? How does he move? How does he live? Ordinary minds cannot understand his actions, life, or movements, any more than a dreaming man can see the world of the awakened. The rishis of the Upanishads declare that a Jīvanmukta is free from desires (Akāmayamāna). "The ancient sages, it is said, did not desire children, thinking: What shall we achieve through children—we who have attained this Self, this world? They renounced, it is said, their desire for sons, for wealth, and for the worlds, and lived a mendicant life."

A Jīvanmukta is free from the illusion of individuality and therefore from the possibility of pain. "He who knows Ātman overcomes grief." "When in the body [thinking this body is I, and I am the body], the Self is held by pleasure and pain; but when He is free from the body [when He knows Himself to be different from the body], neither pleasure nor pain touches Him."

A Jīvanmukta is free from the binding effects of past action. "All works cease to bear fruit." It is consciousness of individuality that impels a man to selfish action, whose good or bad result he must reap at a future date. But the liberated man has realized his individuality as a part of the cosmic illusion and, with the attainment of Knowledge, freed himself from its spell. The awakened person does not reap the fruit of his dream actions.

A liberated man is not given to inactivity, which is characteristic of Tamas. He sees action in non-action and non-action in action. Actions do not cling to him. Even while performing actions through his body and senses, he knows his inner Self to be actionless and detached. He knows that the Self is not the doer, but the Witness; It is not the actor, but the Spectator. He can never perform an evil action. All his evil instincts were destroyed when he practiced spiritual discipline. Only good comes out of him—and that, too, without any effort. "This is the eternal glory of a knower of Brahman: it never increases or decreases by work. [Therefore] one should know the nature of that alone. Knowing it, one is not touched by evil action. Therefore, he who knows it as such becomes self-controlled, calm, withdrawn into himself, enduring, and concentrated, and sees the Self in his own body; he sees all as the Self. Evil does not overtake him, but he transcends all evil. Evil does not trouble him, [but] he consumes all evil. He becomes sinless, taintless, free from doubts, and a knower of Brahman.

A liberated soul has attained the blessed state of being free from doubt. "All doubts are resolved." His knowledge of Ātman is not based upon intellect but is the result of direct experience. And the illusion, once destroyed, does not come back.

A Jīvanmukta is no longer concerned about bondage or Liberation; for these really do not belong to Ātman, the Self ever free. Bondage and Liberation are characteristics of the mind. On account of Māyā, an ignorant person thinks of himself as bound and then strives for Liberation; but Ātman is always free. In the inspiring words of Gauḍāpada: "There is neither death nor birth, neither a struggling nor a bound soul, neither a seeker after Liberation nor a liberated one—this, indeed, is the ultimate truth."


References:
  1. Grimes, John (1996). A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy: Sanskrit Terms Defined in English. Albany: State University of New York Press
  2. Nikhilananda, Swami (1949). The Upanishads: Volume I—Katha, Iśa, Kena, and Mundaka. New York, New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers. p. 105-106.

Thursday, May 23, 2019

Samādhi | Complete Absorption

Samadhi

Samādhi (IAST)
Translation: "Complete Absorption"

A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy 
Sanskrit: समाधि
Transliteration: Samādhi
Translation: "one-pointedness; concentration; absorption; union; a calm desire-less fixity; a unifying concentration; “equal mind” (from the verb root dhā – “to hold” + the prefixes ā + sam – “together completely”)"
Definition:
  1. It is a deep spiritual meditation or a meditative union with the Absolute.
  2. A superconscious state where there is complete absorption of the intellect into the object of meditation.
  3. A state beyond expression and above all thought. Here, speech and mind cannot reach. It is a state of utter calmness in which consciousness is unwavering.
  4. It is a limb of Patañjali’s Rāja-Yoga.
  5. According to Yoga, it has four aspects: Vitarka, Vicāra, Ānanda, and Asmitā. These are called Samādhi with knowledge of objects (Samprajñāta). There is also a Samādhi without any knowledge of objects (Asamprajñāta).
  6. According to Buddhism, it is of three types: Upacāra or preliminary; Jhāna or fixed and steady; and Appanā or achieved meditation.
  7. It has also been divided into Samādhi with the mind (Savikalpa) and Samādhi without any mental modifications (Nirvikalpa).

The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy
Transliteration: Sāṃādhi
Definition: "Sanskrit term meaning ‘concentration’, ‘absorption’, ‘superconscious state’, ‘altered state of consciousness’. In India’s philosophical tradition, this term was made famous by its use in the Yoga system of Patañjali (second century B.C.). In this system, the goal was to attain the self’s freedom, so that the self, conceived as pure consciousness in its true nature, would not be limited by the material modes of existence. It was believed that through a series of Yogic techniques, the self is freed from its karmic fetters and liberated to its original state of self-luminous consciousness, known as Samādhi. The Indian philosophical systems had raised and debated many epistemological and metaphysical questions regarding the nature of consciousness, the concept of mind, and the idea of the self. They also wondered whether a Yogi who has attained Samādhi is within the confines of the conventional moral realm. This issue is similar to Nietzsche’s idea of the transvaluation of values."

Glossary to the Record of Yoga (Sri Aurobindo)
Transliteration: Samādhi
Definition: "concentration; trance; the last member of the Vijñāna Catuṣṭaya: the placing of the consciousness in particular conditions that give it access to larger fields of experience, so that “one can become aware of things in this world outside our ordinary range or go into other worlds or other planes of existence.” The term Samādhi includes three principal states corresponding to those of waking (Jāgrat), dream (Svapna) and deep sleep (Suṣupti), but it is applied especially to states of consciousness “in which the mind is withdrawn from outward things” and is often equivalent to Svapnasamādhi."


Samādhi in the Yoga-Sūtras of Patañjali


The three stages of meditation leading up to Samādhi


देशबन्धश्चित्तस्यधारणा ॥ १ ॥
Part 3 Sutra 1
Deśa-Bandhaś Cittasya Dhāraṇā
Concentration (Dhāraṇā) is the binding of the mind in one place.

देश – Deśa – place, space location, position; locality
बन्धः – Bandhaḥ – bond, bondage, binding; control; determination; confining; fixing; lock (from the verb root bandh – “to bind”)
चित्तस्य – Cittasya – of the mind
धारणा – Dhāraṇā – concentration; support; single-mindedness; “holding, bearing”; “to keep in remembrance”; steadiness; “holding on to one idea or object in the mind or by the mind”


तत्र प्रत्ययैकतानता ध्यानम् ॥ २ ॥
Part 3 Sutra 2
Tatra Pratyayaika-Tānatā Dhyānam
Contemplation (Dhyāna) is stretching in that one condition.

तत्र – Tatra – in that place, there, in it, thither, to that place, in that, in that case, on that occasion, under those circumstances; then, therefore; of those, of them
प्रत्यय – Pratyaya – condition, perception, thought, intention, representation; content of the mind; suffix (from the verb root i – “to go” + prati – “against, back”)
एक – Eka – one, unique; Reality, the One, the sole Reality
तानता – Tānatā – stretching or streaming unbrokenly; extension
ध्यानम् – Dhyānam – contemplation


तदेवार्थमात्रनिर्भासं स्वरूपशून्यमिव समाधिः ॥ ३ ॥
Part 3 Sutra 3
Tad Evārtha-Mātra-Nirbhāsaṃ Svarūpa-Śūnyam Iva Samādhiḥ
That is complete absorption (Samādhi) when the meaning of the object alone is shining as if empty of its own form.

तद् – Tad – that, its
एव – Eva – thus, therefore, only; in fact; without limitation; even; alone; itself; as if; verily
अर्थ – Artha – meaning; meaning of a word; real meaning; “true knowledge of the object which the Yogi wants”; “the “object” being meditated upon”; object, thing, purpose, aim, approach; wealth (from the verb root arth – “to request the sense, to point out”)
मात्र – Mātra – only
निर्भासं – Nirbhāsaṃ – shining; shining (with); appearing (as); “shining or appearing therein”
स्व – Sva – own
रूप – Rūpa – form, aggregate, body, matter, sight, color, image
शून्यम् – Śūnyam – empty, the void, non-being, non-existence, negation, emptiness, zero (from the verb root śū, śvā, śvi – “to swell”)
इव – Iva – like, thus, as it were, as if
समाधिः – Samādhiḥ – complete absorption, one-pointedness, concentration, absorption, union, oneness, integration; trance, superconscious state, altered state of consciousness; “a calm desireless fixity”, “a unifying concentration”, “equal mind” (from the verb root dhā – “to hold” + the prefixes ā + sam – “together completely”)


त्रयमेकत्र संयमः ॥ ४ ॥
Part 3 Sutra 4
Trayam Ekatra Saṃyamaḥ
These three taken as one constitute combined practice (Saṃyama).

त्रयम् – Trayam – these three; the three; triad, trinity
एकत्र – Ekatra – in one, as one, in one place, jointly
संयमः – Saṃyamaḥ – combined practice, self-control, constraint, perfect discipline; concentration; identification; “a technical word meaning Dhāraṇā, Dhyāna, and Samādhi taken together”


Samprajñāta and Asamprajñāta Samādhi


वितर्कविचारानन्दास्मितारूपानुगमात् सम्प्रज्ञातः ॥ १७ ॥
Part 1 Sutra 17
Vitarka-Vicārānandāsmitā-Rūpānugamāt Samprajñātaḥ
Reasoning (Vitarka), enquiry (Vicāra), bliss (Ānanda), and the sense of ‘I’ (Asmitā) are the accompanying forms of Samprajñāta (“Samādhi with Prajñā”).

वितर्क – Vitarka – reasoning, debate, logical argument, analytical thinking, argumentation; a state of Samādhi
विचार – Vicāra – enquiry, reflection, introspection, investigation, insight, intellectual reflection, judgment, deliberation
आनन्द – Ānanda – bliss, delight, joy, ecstasy, beatitude; “a type of Samādhi in which the mind concentrates on the intellect” (from the verb root nand – “to rejoice”)
अस्मिता – Asmitā – the sense of ‘I’; egoism; I-am-ness; sense of individuality; sense of pure being
रूप – Rūpa – form, aggregate, body, matter, sight, color, image
अनुगमात् – Anugamāt – accompanying, going with, following; by accompaniment; with association
सम्प्रज्ञातः – Samprajñātaḥ – “Samādhi with Prajñā”; “a stage in Samādhi wherein one is conscious of an object”; cognitive; “Conscious Meditation”


विरामप्रत्ययाभ्यासपूर्वः संस्कारशेषोऽन्यः ॥ १८ ॥
Part 1 Sutra 18
Virāma-Pratyayābhyāsa-Pūrvaḥ Saṃskāra-Śeṣo’nyaḥ
On the cessation of the condition from the preceding practice, the residual impression is the other [Asamprajñāta].

विराम – Virāma – cessation, dropping
प्रत्यय – Pratyaya – condition, suffix, perception, thought, intention, representation; content of the mind (from the verb root i – “to go” + prati – “against, back”)
अभ्यास – Abhyāsa – practice, continuous endeavor, constant practice, persistent practice, intense application; repetition; exercise, exertion; action; method, discipline (from the verb root as – “to throw” + abhi – “toward”)
पूर्वः – Pūrvaḥ – preceding, earlier, previous; preceded by
संस्कार – Saṃskāra – impression, latent impression, predisposition, consecration, imprint, innate tendency, innate potency, mold, inborn nature, residual impression, mental formation, “habitual reaction formed by one’s past”, “stamping with a tendency”; purificatory rite, rite of passage (from sam + kṛ – “to fashion or to do together”)
शेषः – Śeṣaḥ – residual, remnant, “part that is left over”; accessory, dependent, the endless, infinite; store; residuum
अन्यः – Anyaḥ – the other, other (i.e., Asamprajñāta – not the Samādhi with Prajñā)


The essential process involved in Sabīja Samādhi


क्षीणवृत्तेरभिजातस्येव मणेर्ग्रहीतृग्रहणग्राह्येषु तत्स्थतदञ्जनता समापत्तिः ॥ ४१ ॥
Part 1 Sutra 41
Kṣīṇa-Vṛtter Abhijātasyeva Maṇer Grahītṛ-Grahaṇa-Grāhyeṣu Tat-Stha-Tad-Añjanatā Samāpattiḥ
Fusion (Samāpatti) [occurs when] modifications decrease; the perceiver, perception, and object of perception are like a transparent jewel that is saturated by that which it rests on.

क्षीण – Kṣīṇa – decreased, dwindled, “have been almost annihilated”
वृत्तेः – Vṛtteḥ – modification, mental mode; “a modification of the mind whose function is to manifest objects”; being, condition, fluctuation, activity, turnings, movements (from the verb root vṛt – “to turn, revolve, roll, move”)
अभिजातस्य – Abhijātasya – transparent; faultless; of transparent; well-polished
इव – Iva – like, thus, as it were
मणेः – Maṇeḥ – jewel or crystal
ग्रहीतृ – Grahītṛ – perceiver, receiver; recipient, cognizer, subject; “one who apprehends or understands”; “one who grasps”
ग्रहण – Grahaṇa – perception, apprehension, cognition; to grasp, grasping, perceiving; “the relation between the subject and object”; power of cognition
ग्राह्येषु – Grāhyeṣu – “object of perception”, cognized objects; grasped
तद् – Tad – that, its
स्थ – Stha – rest, abide
तद् – Tad – that, its
अञ्जनता – Añjanatā – saturation; “taking the form of something else”, “the taking of the form or color”
समापत्तिः – Samāpattiḥ – fusion, coalescence; coincidence; unified contemplation, engrossment, “state of becoming one”; attainment, achievement, consummation; outcome


The different phases of Sabīja Samādhi


तत्र शब्दार्थज्ञानविकल्पैः सङकीर्णा सवितर्का समापत्तिः ॥ ४१ ॥
Part 1 Sutra 42
Tatra Śabdārtha-Jñāna-Vikalpaiḥ Saṅkīrṇā Savitarkā Samāpattiḥ
In that case, when sound (Śabda), meaning (Artha), and knowledge [of facts] (Jñāna) in the imagination are mixed up, fusion (Samāpattiḥ) is with reasoning (Savitarkā).

तत्र – Tatra – in that place, there, in it, thither, to that place, in that, in that case, on that occasion, under those circumstances; then, therefore; of those, of them
शब्द – Śabda – sound, word, verbal, verbal testimony, verbal knowledge, linguistic, scriptural authority (from the verb root śabd – “sound”)
अर्थ – Artha – meaning; meaning of a word; real meaning; “true knowledge of the object which the Yogi wants”; “the “object” being meditated upon”; object, thing, purpose, aim, approach; wealth (from the verb root arth – “to request the sense, to point out”)
ज्ञान – Jñāna – knowledge, wisdom, insight, comprehension, conception (from the verb root jñā– “to know”)
विकल्पैः – Vikalpaiḥ – imagination; mental construct; abstraction; conceptualization; hallucination; distinction; experience; thought; “oscillation of the mind”; variation; variety; distinction (from the verb root klp – “to correspond, in accordance with, suitable to,” + vi – “asunder or away”)
सङकीर्णा – Saṅkīrṇā – intermingled, mixed up; confused; unresolved; involved
सवितर्का – Savitarkā – with reasoning, thought, reasoning; “one of the two types of Vitarka concentration”; “a type of Samādhi in which the mind is withdrawn into itself, but goes on thinking and reasoning”
समापत्तिः – Samāpattiḥ – fusion, coalescence; coincidence; unified contemplation, engrossment, “state of becoming one”; attainment, achievement, consummation; outcome


स्मृतिपरिशुद्धौ स्वरूपशून्येवार्थमात्रनिर्भासा निर्वितर्का ॥ ४३ ॥
Part 1 Sutra 43
Smṛti-Pariśuddhau Svarūpa-Śunyevārtha-Mātra-Nirbhāsā Nirvitarkā
The clarification of memory (Smṛti) is without reasoning (Nirvitarkā) when only the meaning is shining as if empty of its own form.

स्मृति – Smṛti – memory, recollection, remembering, depth memory; mindfulness; “that which is remembered” (from the verb root smṛ – “to remember”)
परिशुद्धौ – Pariśuddhau – clarification, wiping clean, purification
स्वरूप – Svarūpa – own form
शुन्य – Śunya – empty, the void, non-being, non-existence, negation, emptiness, zero (from the verb root śū, śvā, śvi – “to swell”)
इव – Iva – like, thus, as it were, as if
अर्थ – Artha – meaning; meaning of a word; real meaning; “true knowledge of the object which the Yogi wants”; “the “object” being meditated upon”; object, thing, purpose, aim, approach; wealth (from the verb root arth – “to request the sense, to point out”)
मात्र – Mātra – only
निर्भासा – Nirbhāsā – shining; shining (with); appearing (as); “shining or appearing therein”
निर्वितर्का – Nirvitarkā – without reasoning


एतयैव सविचारा निर्विचारा च सूक्ष्मविषया व्याख्याता ॥ ४४ ॥
Part 1 Sutra 44
Etayaiva Savicārā Nirvicārā Ca Sūkṣma-Viṣayā Vyākhyātā
In the same way [as in Part 1, Sutra 41-43], [the process of] Savicārā (with enquiry) and Nirvicārā (without enquiry) on subtle objects are explained.

एतय – Etaya – by this
इव – Iva – like, thus, as it were
सविचारा – Savicārā – with enquiry, reflecting, reflection, with judgment; “a stage in Samādhi wherein the mind (Citta) is identified with some subtle object and assumes its form”; “a type of Samādhi “in which the mind does not reason logically but judges and perceives”
निर्वचारा – Nirvicārā – without enquiry; not reflecting
च – Ca – and
सूक्ष्म – Sūkṣma – subtle; non-material, unmanifest; attenuated; fine; “not belonging to the physical world perceived by the outer mind and senses”; “(relating to) the subliminal parts of our being or the supraphysical planes of existence (Lokas) between the Sthūla and the Kāraṇa”
विषया – Viṣayā – object, object (of experience), subject matter, content; “an object of sensory or other experience”
व्याख्याता – Vyākhyātā – explained, described


सूक्ष्मविषयत्वं चालिङगपर्यवसानम् ॥ ४५ ॥
Part 1 Sutra 45
Sūkṣma-Viṣayatvaṃ Cāliṅga-Paryavasānam
[...] and extends to subtle objects without any characteristic (Aliṅga).

सूक्ष्म – Sūkṣma – subtle; non-material, unmanifest; attenuated; fine; “not belonging to the physical world perceived by the outer mind and senses”; “(relating to) the subliminal parts of our being or the supraphysical planes of existence (Lokas) between the Sthūla and the Kāraṇa”
विषयत्वं – Viṣayatvaṃ – object; “the thing itself”, “thus-ness of an object”
च – Ca – and
अलिङग – Aliṅga – “without any characteristic, mark, or differentiating characteristic”; “the last stage of the Guṇa”; without form
पर्यवसानम् – Paryavasānam – extending, terminating, extending (up to)


ता एव सबीजः समाधिः ॥ ४६ ॥
Part 1 Sutra 46
Tā Eva Sabījaḥ Samādhiḥ
These [Part 1 Sutra 41-45], therefore, constitute complete absorption (Samādhi) with seed (Sabīja).

ताः – Tāḥ – these, those
एव – Eva – thus, therefore, only; in fact; without limitation; even; alone; itself; as if; verily
सबीजः – Sabījaḥ – with seed, with attributes; having an object; objective
समाधि – Samādhi – complete absorption, one-pointedness, concentration, absorption, union, oneness, integration; trance, superconscious state, altered state of consciousness; “a calm desireless fixity”, “a unifying concentration”, “equal mind” (from the verb root dhā – “to hold” + the prefixes ā + sam – “together completely”)


निर्विचारवैशारद्येऽध्यात्मप्रसादः ॥ ४७ ॥
Part 1 Sutra 47
Nirvicāra-Vaiśāradye’dhyātma-Prasādaḥ
In the purity of (the process without enquiry) Nirvicārā, clarification of the supreme Self.

निर्विचार – Nirvicārā – without enquiry; not reflecting
वैशारद्ये – Vaiśāradye – purity, lucidity; “on the refinement”; “on attaining the utmost purity”
अध्यात्म – Adhyātma – of the supreme Self
प्रसादः – Prasādaḥ – clarification, grace (from the verb root sad – “to sit” + the prefix pra – “to settle down, grace, favor”); “a gift from God”; “an offering made to God which is then distributed to devotees with His blessings”; clarity; tranquillity; serenity, calming, tranquilizing, clearness; contentment; “an illumined ease and clarity”, purification; lucidity


ऋतम्भरा तत्र प्रज्ञा ॥ ४८ ॥
Part 1 Sutra 48
Ṛtambharā Tatra Prajñā
In that, the wisdom (Prajñā) is truth-bearing.

ऋतम् – Ṛtam – truth, law, right, order, “the course of things” (from the root ṛ - “to rise, tend upward”)
भरा – Bharā – bearing
तत्र – Tatra – in that place, there, in it, thither, to that place, in that, in that case, on that occasion, under those
circumstances; then, therefore; of those, of them
प्रज्ञा – Prajñā – wisdom; intuitive wisdom; gnosis


श्रुतानुमानप्रज्ञाभ्यामन्यविषया विशेषार्थत्वात् ॥ ४९ ॥
Part 1 Sutra 49
Śrutānumāna-Prajñābhyām Anya-Viṣayā Viśeṣārthatvāt
Revealed scripture (Śruti) and inference (Anumāna) are different from wisdom (Prajñā) because its object has a particular meaning.

श्रुति – Śruti – revealed scripture, Veda, what is heard; direct assertion; teachings; inspiration; “(based on) revelation or testimony”
अनुमान – Anumāna – inference; syllogism; instrument of inference (from the verb root mā – “to measure, prepare, display” + anu – “along, after”)
प्रज्ञाभ्याम् – Prajñābhyām – wisdom
अन्यः – Anyaḥ – other
विषया – Viṣayā – object, object (of experience), subject matter, content; “an object of sensory or other experience”
विशेष – Viśeṣa – particular, particularity, the qualified; propriety, distinction; distinct, gradation; differentiation; special
अर्थत्वात् – Arthatvāt – meaning, function, role


तज्जः संस्कारोऽन्यसंस्कारप्रतिबन्धी ॥ ५० ॥
Part 1 Sutra 50
Taj-jaḥ Saṃskāro’nya-Saṃskāra-Pratibandhī
The impression born of that [wisdom] obstructs other impressions.

तद् – Tad – that, its
जः – Jaḥ – “born of”; “are the result of”
सम्स्कार – Saṃskāra – impression
अन्यः – Anyaḥ – other
सम्स्कार – Saṃskāra – impression, latent impression, predisposition, consecration, imprint, innate tendency, innate potency, mold, inborn nature, residual impression, mental formation, “habitual reaction formed by one’s past”, “stamping with a tendency”; purificatory rite, rite of passage (from sam + kṛ – “to fashion or to do together”)
प्रतिबन्धी – Pratibandhī – obstructs, prevents, preventer; “that which stands in the way of”


The technique of Nirbīja Samādhi


तस्यापि निरोधे सर्वनिरोधान्निर्बीजः समाधिः ॥ ५१ ॥
Part 1 Sutra 51
Tasyāpi Nirodhe Sarva-Nirodhān Nirbījaḥ Samādhiḥ
On its cessation and by the cessation of all, complete absorption (Samādhi) without seed (Nirbīja).

तस्य – Tasya – its, of it, of this, that
अपि – Api – also; even
निरोधे – Nirodhe – on cessation
सर्व – Sarva – all; complete; the All
निरोधात् – Nirodhāt – by cessation
निर्बीजः – Nirbījaḥ – without seed, seedless; attributeless; subjective
समाधिः – Samādhiḥ – complete absorption, one-pointedness, concentration, absorption, union, oneness, integration; trance, superconscious state, altered state of consciousness; “a calm desireless fixity”, “a unifying concentration”, “equal mind” (from the verb root dhā – “to hold” + the prefixes ā + sam – “together completely”)


तदपि बहिरङग निर्बीजस्य ॥ ८ ॥
Part 3 Sutra 8
Tad Api Bahir-Aṅgam Nirbījasya
Even that [Sabīja Samādhi] is external to the seedless (Nirbīja Samādhi).

तद् – Tad – that, its
अपि – Api – also; even
बहिः – Bahiḥ – external, outside; external world
अङगम् – Aṅgam – “limb”; individual part; accessory; member; technique; a scripture (from the verb root ang – “to move”)
निर्बीजस्य – Nirbījasya – to the seedless


तदा विवेकनिम्नं कैवल्यप्राग्भारं चित्तम् ॥ २६ ॥
Part 4 Sutra 26
Tadā Viveka-Nimnaṃ Kaivalya-Prāg-Bhāraṃ Cittam
Then the mind is inclined towards discrimination (Viveka) and gravitating towards isolation (Kaivalya).

तदा – Tadā – then
विवेक – Viveka – discrimination, intuitive discrimination
निम्नं – Nimnaṃ – bent, inclined, inclined toward
कैवल्य – Kaivalya – isolation, aloofness, aloneness; emancipation, “isolation of pure awareness”; “separation from everything”
प्राग् – Prāg – before, towards
भारं – Bhāraṃ – load
चित्तम् – Cittam – mind; consciousness; thought; apperception (from the verb root cit – “to perceive, observe, know”)


तच्छिद्रेषु प्रत्ययान्तराणि संस्कारेभ्यः ॥ २७ ॥
Part 4 Sutra 27
Tac-Chidreṣu Pratyayāntarāṇi Saṃskārebhyaḥ
Thoughts (Pratyaya) [arise] in the intervals from the force of impressions (Saṃskāra).

तद् – Tad – that, its
छिद्रेषु – Chidreṣu – interval, gap
प्रत्यय – Pratyaya – condition, suffix, perception, thought, intention, representation (from the verb root i – “to go” + prati – “against, back”); content of the mind
अन्तराणि – Antarāṇi – other; the other
संस्कारेभ्यः – Saṃskārebhyaḥ – from the force of impressions


हानमेषां क्लेशवदुक्तम् ॥ २८ ॥
Part 4 Sutra 28
Hānaṃ Eṣāṃ Kleśavad Uktam
The removal of these [Saṃskāra], like that of the afflictions (Kleśa), has been described.

हानं – Hānaṃ – relinquishing; liberation; detachment; cessation; avoidance; remedy; abolition; dispersion; removal
एषां – Eṣāṃ – of these
क्लेशवत् – Kleśavat – “like the causes of suffering”; “like that of the Kleśa or afflictions”
उक्तम् – Uktam – described, explained; “has been said, declared, or described”


प्रसङख्यानेऽप्यकुसिदस्य सर्वथा विवेकख्यातेर्धर्ममेघः समाधिः ॥ २९ ॥
Part 4 Sutra 29
Prasaṅkhyāne’pyakusīdasya Sarvathā Viveka-Khyater Dharma-Meghaḥ Samādhiḥ
One who has no interest left even in the knowledge of the highest meditation, maintaining discriminative awareness in all circumstances, enters the final state of one-pointedness (Dharma-Megha-Samādhi).

प्रसङख्याने – Prasaṅkhyāne – continued meditation, elevation, summit, “in the knowledge of the highest meditation”
अपि – Api – also; even
अकुसिदस्य – Akusīdasya – “of one who has no interest left”; “one without greed”
सर्वथा – Sarvathā – “in all circumstances”; past, present, and future; “in all time and space”
विवेक – Viveka – discrimination, intuitive discrimination
ख्यतेः – Khyateḥ – awareness, apprehension, discernment, knowledge, vision, seeing
धर्म – Dharma – property, visible form, constituent substance, attributes; functions; righteousness; merit; religious duty; religion; law (from the verb root dhṛ – “to uphold, to establish, to support”)
मेघः – Meghaḥ – cloud, rain showers, shower
समाधिः – Samādhiḥ – complete absorption, one-pointedness, concentration, absorption, union, oneness, integration; trance, superconscious state, altered state of consciousness; “a calm desireless fixity”, “a unifying concentration”, “equal mind” (from the verb root dhā – “to hold” + the prefixes ā + sam – “together completely”)


The three kinds of transformations involved in Samādhi


Pariṇāma (Transformation)
व्युत्थाननिरोधसंस्कारयोरभिभवप्रादुर्भावौ निरोधक्षणचित्तान्वयो निरोधपरिणामः ॥ ९ ॥
Part 3 Sutra 9
Vyutthāna-Nirodha-Saṃskārayor Abhibhava-Prādur-Bhāvau Nirodha-Kṣaṇa-Cittānvayo Nirodha-Pariṇāmaḥ
The cessation of the impressions (Saṃskāra) that are rising up, the suppression of manifest states of being, and the moments of stillness that permeate the mind [define] Nirodha-Pariṇāmaḥ.

व्युत्थान – Vyutthāna – rising up, emergence, awakening; “the state of out-turned-ness”; a stage in Yoga
निरोध – Nirodha – negation; cessation; restriction; stilling; inhibition; suppression; stoppage; restraint; control (from the verb root rudh – “to obstruct, arrest, avert,” + ni – “down or into”)
संस्कारयोः – Saṃskārayoḥ – of the impressions
अभिभव – Abhibhava – suppression, subjugation; submergence; becoming latent
प्रादुर् – Prādur – outside, manifest
भावौ – Bhāvau – “state of being”; existence; emotion; feeling; attitude; condition; becoming; state (from the verb root bhū – “to become, exist”)
निरोध – Nirodha – negation; cessation; restriction; stilling; inhibition; suppression; stoppage; restraint; control (from the verb root rudh – “to obstruct, arrest, avert,” + ni – “down or into”)
क्षण – Kṣaṇa – moment, “an extremely small portion of time”, movement
चित्त – Citta – mind; consciousness; thought; apperception (from the verb root cit – “to perceive, observe, know”)
अन्वयः – Anvayaḥ – pervasiveness; relation, connected to; permeated; all-pervading (state); all-pervasiveness; permeation; pervasion; positive; affirmative; nexus
निरोध – Nirodha – negation; cessation; restriction; stilling; inhibition; suppression; stoppage; restraint; control (from the verb root rudh – “to obstruct, arrest, avert,” + ni – “down or into”)
परिणामः – Pariṇāmaḥ – transformation, change, modification, evolution, development, ripening, changing


तस्य प्रशान्तवाहिता संस्कारात् ॥ १० ॥
Part 3 Sutra 10
Tasya Praśānta-Vāhitā Saṃskārāt
Its flow becomes tranquil by repeated impression.

तस्य – Tasya – its, of it, of this, that
प्रशान्त – Praśānta – peaceful, tranquil, undisturbed
वाहिता – Vāhitā – flow, progression
संस्कारात् – Saṃskārāt – by (repeated) impression


सर्वर्थतैकाग्रतयोः क्षयोदयौ चित्तस्य समाधिपरिणामः ॥ ११ ॥
Part 3 Sutra 11
Sarvārthataikāgratayoḥ Kṣayodayau Cittasya Samādhi-Pariṇāmaḥ
Complete one-pointedness (Ekāgrata) on the meaning and the destruction of appearances of the mind [define] Samādhi-Pariṇāma.

सर्व – Sarva – all; complete; the All
अर्थत – Arthata – “regarding the meaning of something”
एकाग्रतयोः – Ekāgratayoḥ – one-pointedness, close attention, focus, fixity of attention, concentratedness
क्षय – Kṣaya – disappearance, loss, diminution, destruction; decay; dwelling, residence, habitation; “abode of the Lord of Death”
उदयौ – Udayau – arising, appearance, rise
चित्तस्य – Cittasya – “of the mind”
समाधि – Samādhi – complete absorption, one-pointedness, concentration, absorption, union, oneness, integration; trance, superconscious state, altered state of consciousness; “a calm desire-less fixity”, “a unifying concentration”, “equal mind” (from the verb root dhā – “to hold” + the prefixes ā + sam – “together completely”)
परिणामः – Pariṇāmaḥ – transformation, change, modification, evolution, development, ripening, changing


ततः पुनः शान्तोदितौ तुल्यप्रत्ययौ चित्तस्यैकाग्रतापरिणामः ॥ १२ ॥
Part 3 Sutra 12
Tataḥ Punaḥ Śāntoditau Tulya-Pratyayau Cittasyaikāgratā-Pariṇāmaḥ
Ekāgratā Pariṇāma, then, again, is when the latent and arisen contents of the mind are exactly similar.

ततः – Tataḥ – from that, from these, from it; after that, then, thence, therefore
पुनः – Punaḥ – again
शान्त – Śānta – peaceful, peace, quiescent, calm, subsided, contentment, latent (from the verb root śam – “to be at peace”)
उदितौ – Uditau – arisen, uprisen
तुल्य – Tulya – similar, exactly similar, equal
प्रत्ययौ – Pratyayau – condition, suffix, perception, thought, intention, representation (from the verb root i – “to go” + prati – “against, back”); content of the mind
चित्तस्य – Cittasya – “of the mind”
एकाग्रता – Ekāgratā – one-pointedness, close attention, focus, fixity of attention, concentratedness
परिणामः – Pariṇāmaḥ – transformation, change, modification, evolution, development, ripening, changing


References:
  1. Grimes, John (1996). A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy: Sanskrit Terms Defined in English. Albany: State University of New York Press
  2. Audi, Robert (1999). The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Second Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press
  3. Hartz, Richard. Glossary to the Record of Yoga (Sri Aurobindo). Retrieved from http://wiki.auroville.org.in/wiki/Glossary_to_the_Record_of_Yoga
  4. Jhā, Gangānātha (1907). The Yoga Darśana: The Sūtra of Patañjali with the Bhāṣya of Vyasa. Bombay: Rajaram Tukaram Tatya
  5. Krishna, Gopi (1972). Kundalini - The Secret of Yoga. Ontario, Canada: F.I.N.D. Research Trust
  6. Taimni, I. K. (1975). The Science of Yoga: The Yoga-Sūtras of Patañjali in Sanskrit with Transliteration in Roman, Translation in English and Commentary: Theosophical Publishing House

Tuesday, May 14, 2019

Yoniḥ | "womb"

Yonih

Yoniḥ (IAST)
Translation: "womb"
From Mandukya Upanishad (Verse 6)

A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy
Sanskrit: योनि
Transliteration: Yoni
Translation: "womb; source; type"

Mundaka and Mandukya Upanishads (Swami Sharvananda)
Sanskrit: योनिः
Transliteration: Yoniḥ
Translation: "the cause"

The Māṇḍūkya Upaniṣad (Swami Krishnananda)
Sanskrit: योनिः
Transliteration: Yoniḥ
Translation: "the womb"
Commentary: "Eṣa Yoniḥ Sarvasya: He is the womb of all things. All things come from Him as the tree comes from a seed. The tree may be vast in its extent in space; yet, it is all hidden in its potentiality in the seed. The future structure or the shape and the nature of the tree are already determined by the content of the seed. It is not that some new thing comes up when there is germination of the seed. Whatever was in the seed, that alone comes out in the form of an effect, namely, the plant, and the tree. The universe is Self-determined in the sense that it is already contained and fully present in the Being of the Causal State, Īśvara. Thus, in a cosmic sense, we may say that everything is determined forever. No change can be brought about in the cosmos by effort of any kind, because all the efforts are the activities of the Jīva whose existence and function are controlled by the seed, namely, Īśvara, from whom all this comes. Omniscience includes knowledge of the future, and if the future is going to be undetermined there cannot be any such thing as omniscience. We cannot say that the future can be changed by individual effort, and the so-called change that we try to introduce in the future is already known to Īśvara, and all our efforts of the future are determined by the Will of Īśvara. So, while there is freedom of choice from the point of view of the Jīva, it is determination from the point of view of the Will of Īśvara. While we seem to change society, God knows already the changes that we are going to introduce, the ‘why’ and the ‘how’ of it. Thus, it is cosmic determination from the point of view of Īśvara, but from the standpoint of the activities of the Jīva, it appears to be a process of change with an indeterminate future. God, Īśvara, therefore, is All-powerful, All-knowing, the seed of all things, the beginning and the end of everything."


References:
  1. Grimes, John (1996). A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy: Sanskrit Terms Defined in English. Albany: State University of New York Press
  2. Sharvananda, Swami (1920). Mundaka and Mandukya Upanishads: With Sanskrit Text; Paraphrase with Word-For-Word Literal Translation, English, Rendering and Comments. Mylapore, Madras: Sri Ramakrishna Math
  3. Krishnananda, Swami (1996). The Māṇḍūkya Upaniṣad. Retrieved from https://www.swami-krishnananda.org/mand_0.html. p. 78-79.

Turīya | The Fourth

Turiya

Turīya (IAST)
Translation: "The Fourth"
From Mandukya Upanishad (Verse 7, 12)

A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy
Sanskrit: तुरीय
Transliteration: Turīya
Translation: "“the fourth”; the transcendental Self; the supreme Reality; the state of witness consciousness"
Definition:
  1. It is the fourth state of consciousness, according to Advaita Vedānta, which is beyond the states of waking, dreaming, and deep sleep and which pervades and transcends all these states. However, it is not really a state but the underlying substratum of the other three states, the waking, dreaming, and deep-sleep states.
  2. It is the real Self which is beyond the changing modes of existence. It is indivisible, ungraspable, unthinkable, and unnameable. Each of the other three states have their own names (Vaiśvānara, Taijasa, and Prajñā), but not the Absolute, which is merely referred to as the Fourth. It is Amātrā or modeless.

Sanskrit: तुरीयतीत
Transliteration: Turīyatīta
Translation: "the state of the individual soul in which it is in a totally blissful condition; beyond the fourth; the highest stage according to some Hindu schools"
Definition:
  1. The state beyond the “fourth” (Turīya). It is the supremely blissful state of complete freedom from all duality and the awareness of the one Self in all, the final attainment.
  2. This is a term used for the individual in Śaiva Siddhānta.

Glossary to the Record of Yoga (Sri Aurobindo)
Transliteration: Turīya
Translation: "fourth"
Definition: “the incommunicable Self or One-Existence... which is the fourth state of the Self” (Ātman), symbolized by the syllable AUM as a whole, “the supreme or absolute self of being” of which the waking self, dream-self and sleep-self (Virāt, Hiraṇyagarbha, and Prajñā) “are derivations for the enjoyment of relative experience in the world;” Brahman in its “pure self-status” about which “neither consciousness nor unconsciousness as we conceive it can be affirmed...; it is a state of super-conscience absorbed in its self-existence, in a self-silence or a self-ecstasy, or else it is the status of a free Superconscient containing or basing everything but involved in nothing.”

The Upanishads: Volume II (Swami Nikhilananda)
Selected from Gauḍapāda's Kārikā, Chapter I: Āgama Prakaraṇa:
"It is one alone that is thus known in the three states. The one Ātman is perceived threefold in the same body. Turīya, the changeless Ruler, is capable of destroying all miseries. All other entities being unreal, the non-dual Turīya alone is known as effulgent and all-pervading. Neither cause nor effect exists in Turīya. Turīya is ever existent and all-seeing. Non-cognition of duality is common to Turīya. But Prajñā is associated with sleep in the form of cause and this sleep does not exist in Turīya. Knowers of Brahman see neither sleep nor dreams in Turīya. Dreaming is the wrong cognition and sleep the non-cognition, of Reality. When the erroneous knowledge in these two is destroyed, Turīya is realized. When the Jīva, asleep under the influence of beginning-less Māyā, is awakened, it then realizes birth-less, sleepless, and dreamless Non-duality. Meditation on the “soundless” brings no attainment."

The Māṇḍūkya Upaniṣad (Swami Krishnananda)
Sanskrit: तुरीय
Transliteration: Turīya
Translation: "“the fourth”
Commentary: "This Absolute is known as the Turīya, or the fourth state of Consciousness, transcending all relational manifestations – causal, subtle, and gross. While the waking consciousness is external and the dream consciousness is internal, this Consciousness is neither external nor internal, because it is not either waking or dreaming. It is neither internally conscious nor externally conscious, Nāntaḥ-Prajñaṃ, Na Bahiṣ Prajñaṃ – not internal consciousness like dream, nor external consciousness like waking. One may think that it is a consciousness simultaneously of both the states. No; It is something different from a simultaneity of consciousness. It is not external, not internal, not a simultaneity of both, either – Nobhayataḥ-Prajñaṃ. It is not also a mass of consciousness like a homogeneous heap of water in the ocean – Na Prajñā-Ghanaṃ. It is not quantitative in its essence. Quantity is spatial, mathematical and Consciousness is not such. Hence, it cannot be called a mass of consciousness, also, because when you think of mass, you think of a heap, a body, indistinguishable, though. Not so is Consciousness – Na Prajñā-Ghanaṃ. It is not featureless Consciousness without any awareness, Na Prajñaṃ. You may think that it is awareness without an object before it. It is not even that, because the object is contained in that Consciousness. It is not Consciousness bereft of objects. It is Consciousness into which the objects have been absorbed. So, it cannot be regarded as a featureless transparency of an ethereal consciousness. It is not also absence of consciousness – Nāprajñam. It is not a state of inert perfection which the schools of thought like the Nyāya and the Vaiśeṣika describe. It is not unconsciousness; it is not absence of consciousness; it is not bare consciousness; it is not a mass of consciousness; it is not external consciousness; it is not internal consciousness; it is not both-ways consciousness. What is this? Such is God in His essence, the Absolute in its True Being."

Laghu Yoga Vaśiṣṭha (K. Narayanaswami Aiyer)
"This is that Principle which is denominated Void by atheists, Parabrahman by Brahmavadins, Vijñāna by Vijñāna doctrinists, Puruṣa by Sāṅkhya, Īśa by Yogins, Śiva by persons upholding Śaivagama, Kala (Time) by Kala doctrinists, the Madhyama by Mādhyamika and the all-pervading Principle by those who look equally upon all." 

Kundalini: The Secret of Yoga (Gopi Krishna)
“According to the Indian scriptures, Turīya is the state of self-knowledge or illumination in which the identity of the Ātman and Brahman or Jiva or Īśvara is realized. It is the indescribable state of existence experienced in the highest form of Samādhi or the ecstatic "State," as Eliade calls it.... in actual fact, Turīya is the modality of consciousness present in Asamprajñāta, Nirvikalpa, or Nirbīja Samādhi, and also characterizes the consciousness of a Jīvanmukta, or one liberated in life. This is clear on the authority of Māṇḍūkya Upaniṣad (7) wherein it is said: "They consider the Fourth (Turīya) to be that which is not conscious of the internal world nor conscious of the external world....That is the Self and that is to be known." Again (in 12) it says: "The partless Om is the Fourth (Caturtha, i.e., Turīya) – beyond all conventional dealings, the limit of the negation of the phenomenal world, the auspicious and the non-dual. Om is thus the Self to be sure. He who knows thus enters the Self through the Self." The position has been clarified beyond doubt by Gauḍapāda in his Kārikā (PI.14 and 15). "The earlier two (Viśva and Taijasa) are endowed with dream and sleep, but Prajñā is endowed with dreamless sleep. People of firm conviction do not see either sleep or dream in Turīya....Dream belongs to one who sees falsely, and sleep to one who does not know Reality. When the two errors of these two are removed, one attains the state that is Turīya.

The point here is whether these four modalities of consciousness are characteristic of the embodied spirit or whether they have an independent existence of their own. The first three, it is hardly necessary to argue, have no independent existence, that is, they do not exist as cosmic planes of wakefulness, dreaming, and dreamless sleep, but represent different states of human consciousness. They are mutually exclusive, that is, as argued by Gauḍapāda, when one is dreaming, he cannot be awake and when in dreamless slumber, he can neither dream nor be awake. Similarly, when one is awake, he cannot dream, in the real sense of the term, nor can he be in dreamless slumber. It is, therefore, obvious that the moment a Yogi enters the dream state with lucidity, that is consciousness, dreaming must cease forthwith, and when one enters the state of dreamless slumber, it too must vanish instantly, for the simple reason that as darkness and light cannot exist together, in the same way the oblivion of the dream state and dreamless slumber cannot co-exist with lucidity for any length of time. It might be contended that the so-called ecstatic "state" (Samādhi), being a transhuman plane of consciousness, can "penetrate" the other three. In reply to this, it is enough to point out that at the very moment when transhuman consciousness penetrates any modality of human consciousness, it must at once transform and illumine it. It can neither assume the modality into which it enters nor co-exist with it."

The Atman Project (Ken Wilber)
SVABHAVIKAKAYA: THE FINAL TRANSFORMATION
"Passing through Nirvikalpa Samādhi, Consciousness totally awakens as its Original Condition and Suchness (Tathatā), which is, at the same time, the condition and suchness of all that is, gross subtle, or causal. That which witnesses, and that which is witnessed, are only one and the same. The entire World Process then arises, moment to moment, as one's own Being, outside of which, and prior to which, nothing exists. That Being is totally beyond and prior to anything that arises, and yet no part of that Being is other than what arises.

And so: as the center of the self was shown to be Archetype; and as the center of Archetype was shown to be final-God; and as the center of final-God was shown to be Formlessness—so the center of Formlessness is shown to be not other than the entire world of Form. "Form is not other than Void, Void is not other than Form," says the most famous Buddhist Sūtra (called the "Heart Sūtra").  At that point, the extraordinary and the ordinary, the supernatural and mundane, are precisely one and the same. This is the tenth Zen oxherding picture, which reads: "The gate of his cottage is closed and even the wisest cannot find him. He goes his own way, making no attempt to follow the steps of earlier sages. Carrying a gourd, he strolls into the market; leaning on his staff, he returns home.

This is also Sahaja Samādhi, the Turiya state, the Svabhāvikakaya—the ultimate Unity, wherein all things and events, while remaining perfectly separate and discrete, are only One. Therefore, this is not itself a state apart from other states; it is not an altered state; it is not a special state—it is rather the suchness of all states, the water that forms itself in each and every wave of experience, as all experience. It cannot be seen, because it is everything which is seen; it cannot be heard, because it is hearing itself; it cannot be remembered because it only is. By the same token, this is the radically perfect integration of all prior levels—gross, subtle, and causal, which, now of themselves so, continue to arise moment to moment in an iridescent play of mutual interpenetration. This is the final differentiation of Consciousness from all forms in Consciousness, "whereupon Consciousness as Such is released in Perfect Transcendence, which is not a transcendence from the world but a final transcendence as the World. Consciousness henceforth operates, not on the world, but only as the entire World Process, integrating and interpenetrating all levels, realms, and planes, high or low, sacred or profane."


References:
  1. Grimes, John (1996). A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy: Sanskrit Terms Defined in English. Albany: State University of New York Press
  2. Hartz, Richard. Glossary to the Record of Yoga (Sri Aurobindo). Retrieved from http://wiki.auroville.org.in/wiki/Glossary_to_the_Record_of_Yoga
  3. Nikhilananda, Swami (1952). The Upanishads: Volume II - Śvetāśvatara, Praśna, and Māndukya with Gauḍapāda's Kārikā. New York, New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers
  4. Krishnananda, Swami (1996). The Māṇḍūkya Upaniṣad. Retrieved from https://www.swami-krishnananda.org/mand_0.html. p. 82.
  5. Aiyer, K. Narayanaswami (1975). Laghu Yoga Vasishtha: English Translation. Theosophical Publishing House. p. 480.
  6. Krishna, Gopi (1972). Kundalini - The Secret of Yoga. Ontario, Canada: F.I.N.D. Research Trust. p. 103-104.
  7. Wilber, Ken (1996). The Atman Project: A Transpersonal View of Human Development. Quest Books. p. 67.

Śiva | Auspicious

Shiva

Śiva (IAST)
Translation: "Auspicious"
From Mandukya Upanishad (Verse 7, 12)

A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy
Sanskrit: शिव
Transliteration: Śiva
Translation: "auspicious; the Ultimate Reality; Lord"
Definition:
  1. According to the Śaiva schools, Śiva is the supreme Godhead. The concept is traced to the Ṛg Veda and He is the same as Rudra.
  2. Literally Śiva means “good or auspicious.”
  3. Lord Śiva exercises five functions: creation (Sṛṣṭi), maintenance (Sthiti), dissolution (Saṃhāra), obscuration (Tirodhāna), and grace (Anugraha).
  4. According to Śaiva Siddhānta, Śiva has eight qualities: independence, purity, self-knowledge, omniscience, freedom from Mala, boundless benevolence, omnipotence, and bliss.
  5. According to Śaiva Siddhānta, Śiva appears in eight forms: earth, water, air, fire, sky, the sun and the moon, and in human beings. See the benedictory (Nāndī) verse of the Abhijñāna-Śakuntala of Kālidāsa.
  6. According to Vīra Shaivism, Śiva manifests in six forms. 
  7. A name for the all-pervasive supreme Reality. As one member of the Hindu trinity, He represents God as the destroyer. He is the personal God of the Śaivites. In His personal form, He is portrayed as a Yogi wearing a tiger skin and holding a trident, with snakes coiled around His neck and arms.
  8. According to Kashmir Shaivism, Śiva has five principles: Vidyā, Īśvara, Sadaśiva, Śakti, and Śiva. He also has five faces: Sadyojāta, Vāmadeva, Aghora, Tatpuruṣa, and Iśana.

The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy
Definition: "Śiva, one of the great gods of Hinduism (with Viṣṇu and Brahman), auspicious controller of Karma and Saṃsāra, destroyer but also giver of life. He is worshiped in Shaivism with his consort Śakti. A variety of deities are regarded in Shaivism as forms of Śiva, with the consequence that polytheism is moved substantially toward monotheism.

The Masks of God, Oriental Mythology (Joseph Campbell)
"A second Vedic figure who supplied a point of juncture with the other system was the fierce god Rudra, to whom but three Vedic hymns are assigned, and whose name, from the root rud, "to cry out," seems to mean "Howler." He became identified in later cult with the meditating Lord of Beasts, discussed above as a proto-Śiva. The epithet Śiva, "Auspicious One," is itself a Sanskrit word and so cannot have been the name of that god in pre-Vedic times. It is addressed in the Vedas, however, to the god Rudra, who, though terrible and destructive, is beneficent as well. He is called a bull and is the father of a great golden troop of young male gods, the Maruts, whose mother was a cow. These hold the lightning in their hands, are decked richly with ornaments, and are as broad as the sky through which their chariots thunder, spilling rain.

O Rudra, Wielder of the Bolt, the best of what
Is born, in glory, mightiest of the mighty:
Transport us in all safety to the farther shore,
Beyond distress, warding off all threats of mischief.

The yonder shore beyond ill, the mighty bolt, the howling host, the bull and cow, the fierce and yet protective character, and the universal rule of the god Rudra, ever young: these are all attributes of the Śiva of later days. However, the emphatically phallic character of the later Hindu god cannot have been derived by any argument from the Vedas; nor his character as the lord of Yoga."


References:
  1. Grimes, John (1996). A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy: Sanskrit Terms Defined in English. Albany: State University of New York Press
  2. Audi, Robert (1999). The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Second Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press
  3. Campbell, Joseph (1991). The Masks of God, Vol. 2: Oriental Mythology. London: Secker & Warburg. p. 208-209.

Prapañcopaśamaṃ | "the negation of all relative existence"

Prapanchopashamam

Prapañcopaśamaṃ (IAST)
Translation: "the negation of all relative existence"
From Mandukya Upanishad (Verses 7, 12)

A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy
Sanskrit: प्रपञ्च
Transliteration: Prapañca
Translation: "the world; world appearance"

Mundaka and Mandukya Upanishads (Swami Sharvananda)
Sanskrit: प्रपञ्चोपशमं
Transliteration: Prapañcopaśamaṃ
Translation: "the negation of all relative existence/devoid of all phenomenal existence"
Commentary: "i.e., the primary test of existence is in the human consciousness. In the first three planes of consciousness, existence is intuited in relation to something that is a posteriori or external, and hence it is called Relative existence. But the consciousness of existence in the Turīya or the fourth plane i.e., in the superconscious state, is of unrelated absolute kind – the existence unconditioned by time, space, or causation. In that state, consciousness is Existence only. The absolute existence and the absolute consciousness are one and the same."

The Māṇḍūkya Upaniṣad (Swami Krishnananda)
Sanskrit: प्रपञ्चोपशमं
Transliteration: Prapañcopaśamaṃ
Definition: Here all Saṃsāra, all this tumult of creation, subsides, like waves sinking into the ocean, as dream is withdrawn into waking consciousness. The universe, in all its conditions – gross, subtle and causal – ceases here. In this state, there is neither the Virāt, nor Hiraṇyagarbha, nor Īśvara; because, there is no creation. This is the Ātman where there is neither waking, nor dreaming, nor sleep. Thus, it is called Prapañcopaśamaṃ.


References:
  1. Grimes, John (1996). A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy: Sanskrit Terms Defined in English. Albany: State University of New York Press
  2. Sharvananda, Swami (1920). Mundaka and Mandukya Upanishads: With Sanskrit Text; Paraphrase with Word-For-Word Literal Translation, English, Rendering and Comments. Mylapore, Madras: Sri Ramakrishna Math
  3. Krishnananda, Swami (1996). The Māṇḍūkya Upaniṣad. Retrieved from https://www.swami-krishnananda.org/mand_0.html. p. 87.